Share
28/05/2012 | השופטים ביניש, גרוניס, ריבלין, נאור, ארבל, חיות, מלצר | Israel
HC 3809/08 Association for Civil Rights v. Israel Police et al

Israel's High Court of Justice denied ACLU and Israel Bar Association petitions for lack of constitutionality of some of the arrangements set out in the Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Powers - Data Communications) Act - 2007, published in the Official Gazette on 12.27.2007 and entered into force on 27.06.2008, that allows Israeli investigative authorities toobtain all communication data, as defined in the Communications Law (Telecommunications and Broadcasting) - 1982.


Date 05/28/2012
High Court of Justice
ACLU v. Israel Police et al

The law should be applied only when there is an actual focused and concrete requirement. 

With respect to the authority set forth in Section 4 of the law it should be interpreted so that the permit for communications data interception without a court warrant is limited, in extreme cases, for the treatment of urgent offenses due to circumstances related to saving lives or difficult circumstances other, all while taking into account a variety of reasons such as the degree of involvement in the offense, the type of data requested, the level of urgency and the gravity of the offense.

28/05/2012

NetLaw Hebrew Version
 Advanced Search
 Follow us on Facebook
 Follow us on Twitter


NEWS
ENGLAND  | Government asks communications firms to store all internet use  
USA  | Over $12 million in fines to the telecom industry  
USA  | The FTC issued new guidance on data collection  
ENGLAND  | A massive database of communications metadata in the UK  
INTERNATIONAL  | Study: stores put customer data at risk with poor WiFi security practices  

ARTICLES
INTERNATIONAL  | Google voice is violating the company`s privacy policy  
USA  | Is There a Privacy Risk in Google Flu Trends?  
USA  | The guide for Internet users  
USA  | Will security become Facebook`s Achilles` heel?  
USA  | With tech, nowhere to run, nowhere to hide  

RULES
GERMANY  | Austrian and German courts protect identity file-sharers  
CANADA  | BMG Canada Inc. v. Doe.  
USA  | USA V. BRADFORD C. COUNCILMAN  

LEGISLATION
EUROPE  | Guidelines on the contents and use of privacy statements on websites  
CALIFORNIA  | California Protection Against Computer Spyware Act  
ENGLAND  | Data Protection Act 1998  
USA  | Children`s Online Privacy Protection Act  
ENGLAND  | Communication Act 2003  

ONLINE SOURCES
BULGARIA  | CPDP - Commission for Personal Data Protection  
FINLAND  | Office of the Data Protection Ombudsman  
CZECH REPUBLIC  | UOOU - Office for Personal Data Protection  
GREECE  | DPA - Hellenic Data Protection Authority  
ENGLAND  | e-CommerceLawDirect  





Sections

Copy Rights

 

© All copyrights reserved to Aviv Eilon, Adv. 1999-2011