|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
RSS
|
||
|
||
| Print Version | ||
| 09/01/04
Coca-Cola Company v. William S. Purdy U.S. Court of Appeals Case No. 02-2894, and No. 03-1929, and No. 03-1795, and No. 03-1795 District of Minnesota Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act . First Amendment does not protect use of mark in domain name to attract unwitting and unwilling audience to message of domain name holder, and domain name holder lacked reasonable grounds to believe his conduct was lawful and entitled to safe harbor provision. |
| Adv. Search | News | Articles | Court Decisions | Legislation | Online Resources | About Us | Terms | HomePage | לאתר בעיברית | Eilon Eghert Adv. |
| © All copyrights reserved to Aviv Eilon, Adv. 1999-2009, | Development : Expim Ltd., | Design : Yael Landau |  |