About the site | Eilon,Eghert & Co. | Contact Us | Hebrew Site
Free
search
לחיפוש לחצו
Home About Eilon, Eghert & Co For More News Click For More Articles Click For More Verdicts Click For More Legislation Click For More Links Click
USA | Internet Jurisdiction |  YAHOO INC V LA LIGUE CONTRE LE
More in Jurisdiction
and Web Sites
News
USA | Judge tosses date-dissing website suit
ENGLAND | Internet defamation case to be heard in the UK
USA | U.S. faces new loss in Net gambling case
USA | Spam research group will ignore court ruling
USA | Yahoo again argues Nazi speech case
Articles
USA | Commentary on Whether Pop-Up Ads Are Spam
USA | The guide for Internet users
USA | Who stands to gain from Wikileaks?
USA | Citizendium: building a better Wikipedia
USA | Do as you say, not as you do
Court Decisions
USA | Beyond Systems Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Company LL...
USA | 2004 Appeal on YAHOO INC V LA LIGUE CONTRE LE
ENGLAND | Lennox Lewis & Ors v. Don King
AUSTRALIA | Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick
Legislation
EUROPE | Guidelines on the contents and use of privacy statements ...
Online Resources
FRANCE | IASAJ - International Association of Supreme Administrative Jurisd...
ENGLAND | CPA - Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
RUSSIA | Cnews - A Russian based tech-news website
AUSTRALIA | ACFID - Australian Council for International Development
USA | Actual Innocence awareness database
Court Decisions in Jurisdiction and Web Sites | 31/07/2005
YAHOO INC V LA LIGUE CONTRE LE
Documents :  Yahoo, Inc. v. La Ligue Contre Le Racisme  
Print Version
Yahoo! seeks a declaration from this Court that the First Amendment precludes enforcement within the United States of a French order intended to regulate the content of its speech over the Internet. Yahoo! has shown that the French order is valid under the laws of France, that it may be enforced with retroactive penalties, and that the ongoing possibility of its enforcement in the United States chills Yahoo!`s First Amendment rights. Yahoo! also has shown that an actual controversy exists and that the threat to its constitutional rights is real and immediate. Defendants have failed to show the existence of a genuine issue of material fact or to identify any such issue the existence of which could be shown through further discovery. Accordingly, the motion for summary judgment will be granted. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.

This verdict was reversed by the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.


הקודם More Court Decisions before - 31/07/2005
More Court Decisions after - 31/07/2005 הבא


Adv. Search News Articles Court Decisions Legislation Online Resources About Us Terms HomePage לאתר בעיברית Eilon Eghert Adv.