| Verdicts |
| Found 40 results that match your search |
| Page 1 out of 3 pages
|
|
|
|
|
 |
02/07/2004 | Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. Canadian Association of Internet Pro
Canada`s Supreme Court ruled that Internet service providers do not have to pay royalties to composers and artists for music downloaded by Web customers.
|
|
|
|
 |
12/05/2004 | United State of America v. Anthony F. Murrell
|
|
|
|
|
16/03/2004 | JANET RENO, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, et al., APPELLANTS v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UN
``At issue is the constitutionality of two statutory provisions enacted to protect minors from ``indecent`` and ``patently offensive`` communications on the Internet. Notwithstanding the legitimacy and importance of the congressional goal of protecting children from harmful materials, we agree with ...
|
|
|
|
 |
03/03/2004 | England | Trade Marks | Reed Executive v Reed Business Information
Reed Executive Plc and Reed Solutions Plc v Reed Business Information Ltd, Reed Elsevier (UK) Ltd and Totaljobs.com Ltd [2004]
|
|
|
|
 |
22/02/2004 | 321Studios v MGM Studios
The Northern District Court of California held that 321 Studios` software is illegal when it breaks through DVDs` scrambling technology, even if the legal owner of a DVD has right to make personal copies of its DVD content.
``It is the technology itself at issue, not the uses to which the copyright...
|
|
|
|
|
21/01/2004 | Ferguson v. Friendfinders, Inc., Case No. A092653
California Court of Appeal has ruled that California`s anti spam statute is constitutional and those who create spam must comply with the statute requirements.
|
|
|
|
 |
16/01/2004 | Dow Jones & Company Inc. v Gutnick
The High Court of Australia held that an Internet defamation case can be heard in Australia, since such publication can be viewed in Australia even when it was published in the USA.
|
|
|
|
 |
15/01/2004 | Barrett v. Clark
The Superior Court of California dismissed a defamation lawsuit holding that the USA Communications Decency Act protects those who post a statement created by another.
|
|
|
|
 |
15/01/2004 | Playboy v. Netscape & Excite
The US court of appeals ruled that Playboy`s trademarks ``playboy`` and ``playmate`` are also protected in Internet searches that has search content criteria pop-up advertisements.
|
|
|
|
 |
24/06/1999 | USA | Trade Mark Keying | Playboy Enterprises v. Netscape and Excite
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
