| Verdicts |
| Found 40 results that match your search |
| Page 3 out of 3 pages
|
|
|
|
|
 |
23/01/2007 | U.K. | copyrights & Software | Point Solutions Ltd vs. Focus Bbusiness Solutions Ltd
``... both parties chose to conduct the proceedings. They chose to deny the judge the assistance of the expert`s report which Master Bragge had directed. They chose to put the judge in the position where the only question which she could decide was whether Point had established on the balance of pro...
|
|
|
|
 |
04/01/2007 | U.S. | Trademarks & Search Engines | J.G. Wentworth v. Settlement Funding
As long as the search results or even ads do not display the trademarks, using trademark keying and keyword meta tags cannot confuse consumers, therefore regarded as lawful act.
|
|
|
|
 |
27/12/2006 | USA | Pornography | JOHNNY DOE, a minor v. MARK BATES and YAHOO! INC.
Internet service providers naturally are concerned about circumstances under which they potentially could be held liable for content posted by users. But after a recent decision by a Texas federal judge, ISPs can breathe a collective sigh of relief.
|
|
|
|
 |
20/11/2006 | USA | Defamation | STEPHEN J. BARRETT v ILENA ROSENTHAL
California Supreme Court ruled Monday that individual Internet users cannot be held liable for republishing defamatory statements written by others.
|
|
|
|
 |
10/03/2006 | USA | Copy Rights | Gordon Roy Parker v. Google Inc
In a ruling issued March the 10th, 2006, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed a lawsuit by Gordon Roy Parker, a publisher of seduction guides. Parker claimed Google infringed his copyright when it cached a portion of his e-book entitled “29 Reasons Not To Be A N...
|
|
|
|
 |
11/12/2005 | New York | Trademarks & Search Engines | Marianne Bihari and Bihari Interiors, Inc. v. Craig Ross an
Due to fraudulent activity by Bihari, an interior designer, and her company the defendants created some websites providing the public with their view of Bihari`s conduct. To increase the popularity of these websites, the defendants used Bihari`s name and service mark in the websites Meta tags.
Plain...
|
|
|
|
 |
11/12/2005 | California | Trademarks & Search Engines | Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Netscape & Excite
Holder of trademarks ``Playboy`` and ``Playmate`` sued seeking to bar providers of Internet search engine from arranging for certain combination of advertisements to appear on results screen when user selected words ``playboy`` or ``playmate`` as search terms. Holder moved for preliminary injunction...
|
|
|
|
 |
11/12/2005 | California | Trademarks & Search Engines | Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Welles
Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Welles 7 F.Supp.2d 1098 (S.D. Cal. 1998
The court finds that plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that a preliminary injunction is warranted since there is not a strong likelihood of success on the merits. Consequently, the Court cannot find that the balance of harm tips ...
|
|
|
|
 |
18/10/2005 | USA | Defamation | Jhon Doe v. Cahill
A politician`s request to disclose the identity of an allegedly defamatory John Doe from an ISP was finally rejected by the Delaware Supreme Court. The court held that in this case free speech outweigh the defamation claims.
|
|
|
|
 |
16/08/2005 | USA | Procedure | AM. BOAT CO. V. UNKNOWN SUNKEN BARGE
If an email was sent and there was no reply of undelivered, it is presumed that the email was received.
|
|
|
|
 |
05/08/2005 | USA | Freedom of Speech, Spam | White Buffalo Ventures LLC v. University of Texas at Austin
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit held in White Buffalo Ventures LLC v. University of Texas at Austin, No. 04-50362, 2005 WL 1806353 (5th Cir. Aug. 2, 2005)that the University of Texas didn`t violate the free-speech rights of an online dating service when it blocked thousands of unsolici...
|
|
|
|
 |
31/07/2005 | USA | Internet Jurisdiction | YAHOO INC V LA LIGUE CONTRE LE
This verdict was reversed by the UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.
|
|
|
|
 |
31/07/2005 | USA | Internet Jurisdiction | Beyond Systems Inc. v. Realtime Gaming Holding Company LLC
Maryland Court of Appeals in an Internet jurisdiction case due to avalibility of website. The court found that availability of downloadable software does not meet the test of “continuous and systematic” activities in the State.
|
|
|
|
 |
02/07/2005 | USA | TM and PopUps | 1-800 Contacts Inc. v. WhenU.com Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2d Circuit found that the use of a company`s Web address in a pop-up advertising software is not a ``use`` of a trademark under the Lanham Act.
|
|
|
|
 |
27/06/2005 | USA | ISP Defamation Liability | Cubby Inc. v Compuserve Inc.
``Given the relevant First Amendment considerations, the appropriate standard of liability to be applied to CompuServe is whether it knew or had reason to know of the allegedly defamatory Rumorville statements``
|
|
|
|
|
RSS
